<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Filler &#187; Programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nerdbucket.com/tags/programming/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nerdbucket.com</link>
	<description>How can a crappy site with boring games waste more space?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The horrible cost of using explicit returns in Ruby&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/the-horrible-cost-of-using-explicit-returns-in-ruby/article</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/the-horrible-cost-of-using-explicit-returns-in-ruby/article#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 03:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nerdbucket.com/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At my lovely new job, we got a trainer to teach us about Ruby, Rails, and agile methodologies. She was pretty good overall, but one thing she mentioned a few times really got on my nerves: &#8220;use implicit returns in &#8230; <a href="http://blog.nerdbucket.com/the-horrible-cost-of-using-explicit-returns-in-ruby/article">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/the-horrible-cost-of-using-explicit-returns-in-ruby/article/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Ruby is so sexy-awesome, part XXXIV</title>
		<link>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/i-still-love-ruby-best-of-al/article</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/i-still-love-ruby-best-of-al/article#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby on Rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nerdbucket.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use Ruby whenever I can. Not specifically with Rails &#8211; Rails extends the language and adds some nifty things, but the beauty is all Ruby&#8217;s. Today I was using Ruby (in a Rails app, as it happens), and I &#8230; <a href="http://blog.nerdbucket.com/i-still-love-ruby-best-of-al/article">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/i-still-love-ruby-best-of-al/article/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dotproject strikes again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/dotproject-strikes-again/article</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/dotproject-strikes-again/article#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 05:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad Programmer!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Shit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dotproject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open_source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nerdbucket.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm sure I've bitched about open source plenty of times, but I have to rant once again.  Dotproject is my project management application of choice.  It does everything I want, and in particular allows for very awesome time estimation which was extremely useful for Bloodsport Colosseum.  I was able to break down every task into subtasks and really get a feel for how much effort was left by looking at the accuracy of past estimates.

But it's programmed by idiots... <a href="http://blog.nerdbucket.com/dotproject-strikes-again/article">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nerdbucket.com/dotproject-strikes-again/article/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

